Scaring Scenario of Geopolitics Under Trump 2.0

Trump’s Radical Stance on Gaza and Global Repercussions

In a recent press conference alongside the Israeli Prime Minister, President Donald Trump made a stunning declaration: “All Palestinians should leave Gaza, and Egypt and Jordan must accommodate them. If necessary, America will occupy Gaza and use military force.” This statement, echoing colonial-era rhetoric, sent shockwaves across the international community, igniting fierce debates on diplomacy, sovereignty, and human rights.

Saudi Arabia’s Response: Balancing Power and Diplomacy

Saudi Arabia, a key regional player and traditional ally of the United States, was quick to respond with diplomatic caution. Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS), while reaffirming Saudi Arabia’s commitment to regional stability, rejected the idea of forceful displacement of Palestinians. Riyadh emphasized that any resolution must be grounded in international law and the two-state solution, warning that forcibly expelling Palestinians could destabilize the Middle East and jeopardize future Arab-Israeli normalization efforts.

France and Europe – Firm Opposition to Trump’s Approach

French President Emmanuel Macron condemned Trump’s remarks, calling them “a blatant violation of human rights and international law.” France, along with Germany and the European Union, reiterated support for a negotiated peace process and denounced any forced displacement. The EU’s High Representative for Foreign Affairs Josep Borrell labeled Trump’s proposal as “unacceptable” and “dangerous for global security.”

The United Nations’ Reaction

The UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres expressed grave concern over Trump’s rhetoric, warning that forced displacement of Palestinians would constitute ethnic cleansing. The UN Security Council convened an emergency session, where China and Russia vehemently opposed the U.S. stance, calling it “a violation of international norms.” Resolutions condemning the plan were tabled, though likely to be vetoed by the U.S.

Global Response and Escalating Tensions- Jordan and Egypt:

Both countries outright rejected Trump’s demand to absorb displaced Palestinians, citing national security concerns and historical precedents.

China and Russia:

Beijing and Moscow seized the opportunity to position themselves as protectors of international law, warning that unilateral U.S. actions would set dangerous precedents.

OPEC Nations:

In an indirect response, OPEC members signaled a potential cut in oil production, leveraging economic pressure against Washington.

Palestinian Reaction – Defiance and Resistance

Unsurprisingly, Palestinian leadership, including Hamas and the Palestinian Authority, vowed to resist any forced expulsion. Demonstrations erupted in Ramallah, Gaza, and the West Bank, with protesters denouncing the U.S. as “complicit in genocide.” Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas accused Trump of “erasing Palestinian identity” and called for immediate international intervention.

Domestic Reaction: America Divided

Trump’s stance on Gaza has further polarized the American public. While his conservative base and evangelical supporters largely backed his pro-Israel policies, Democratic lawmakers and progressive groups condemned his plan as “inhumane and reckless.”

A CNN poll revealed that 55% of Americans opposed military occupation of Gaza, while only 38% supported it. Anti-war protests erupted in major U.S. cities, with activists drawing parallels to America’s prolonged entanglements in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Trump’s Unilateralism: A Pattern of Withdrawals

Trump’s foreign policy has been characterized by isolationist moves. During his first term, he withdrew the U.S. from:

The World Health Organization (WHO) – citing inefficiency and Chinese influence.

The Paris Climate Agreement – dismissing climate change as a “hoax.”

The UN Human Rights Council – criticizing it as “biased against Israel.”

Now, reports suggest he may withdraw from the World Trade Organization (WTO) if China lodges a formal complaint over tariffs. This could ignite a global trade war, destabilizing markets and further alienating U.S. allies.

Projection The Next Four Years Under Trump 2.0

If Trump follows through with his extreme foreign policy positions, several scenarios could unfold:

Increased Middle East Conflict: A potential U.S. military intervention in Gaza could trigger a broader regional war, involving Iran-backed militias, Hezbollah, and other resistance groups.

Economic Backlash: A trade war with China and strained relations with Europe could weaken the U.S. economy.

Declining Global Influence: America’s unilateral decisions may push allies towards greater cooperation with China and Russia, diminishing U.S. diplomatic power.

The High Cost of Arrogance: Emmanuel Todd’s 2001 prediction of America’s decline seems increasingly relevant. Trump’s “America First” policies, rooted in arrogance and coercion, risk not only alienating allies but also hastening U.S. isolation on the world stage.

Unless a more balanced approach is adopted, Trump’s four-year term could mark a significant shift in global power dynamics—one that accelerates the decline of American dominance rather than reinforcing it.

The Muslim World: A Growing Call for Unity and Strength

There is a deep and widespread awareness within the Muslim Ummah that they have long been subjected to external pressures, conflicts, and injustices. Over the past several decades, Muslim nations and communities have faced political instability, economic exploitation, and socio-cultural challenges, often exacerbated by global power dynamics. This collective experience has fostered a growing realization that no external force truly prioritizes their well-being. Consequently, there is now an emerging sense of urgency for change—an awakening that emphasizes unity, self-reliance, and collective resistance against external hostilities.

Muslims possess a rich and illustrious history, marked by significant contributions to science, philosophy, governance, and economic development. Today, the Muslim world remains a cornerstone of the global economy, endowed with vast natural resources, particularly oil and gas, which fuel much of the world’s energy needs. Despite making up nearly 25% of the global population and contributing significantly to international trade and commerce, many Muslim nations continue to face political marginalization and economic disparities. This imbalance underscores the need for greater cohesion and strategic cooperation among Muslim-majority countries to assert their rightful place in global affairs.

The time has come for the Muslim world to transcend divisions and forge stronger bonds based on mutual respect, shared interests, and collective progress. By fostering economic collaboration, political solidarity, and technological advancement, Muslim nations can reposition themselves as key players on the global stage. The challenges faced by the Ummah demand not just awareness but decisive action—toward a future where Muslim nations are not merely reactive to global events but actively shape them. The call for unity is no longer an option but a necessity, as the Muslim world moves toward reclaiming its dignity, sovereignty, and influence in international affairs.