When it came to India-Pakistan tensions the world had been made to believe through writings by Western and Indian analysts and various table top exercises conducted in track-2 initiatives that the only probable and imaginable trigger point for the onset of a crisis in South Asia could be a terrorist incident in India or Indian held territories by terrorists which could be directly or indirectly linked to Pakistan and thus all Indian responses in the form of so called surgical strikes were deemed to be justified. Recently an attack on a CRPF convoy at Pulwama in IHK by a local Kashmiri youth was taken as a justification for India’s provocative air strike at an alleged terrorist training camp inside Pakistani territory. However, a much more serious crisis has been precipitated by India’s right wing Hindu nationalist political leadership which justifies a surgical strike at the much vaunted parliament chambers in New Delhi or maybe somewhere in Gujarat at an RSS training camp.
On the strategic plane given the hyper nationalism and jingoism being drummed up by BJP and its militant offshoots such as RSS and their threats to forcibly annex the Pakistani controlled part of Jammu and Kashmir and the public commitments made by Pakistani leadership to forcefully respond to any Indian aggression has created a cul-de-sac from which there would be no escape. The inflammatory rhetoric by the Indian side and deeply emotional sentiments in support of the Kashmiris in Pakistan has created a situation that is ripe with the potential to blow out of control by the first spark. The US role during the Pulwama crisis was muddled at best while Russia, China and some of the Middle Easter countries played some behind the scenes role in the diffusion of the crisis. Given that the emotions are running high and China itself is protesting against turning of Ladakh into a union territory by India the crisis would be far more complicated with a serious potential for escalation that may not provide sufficient time for the international community to exercise a restraining influence over the contending parties.
During the Pulwama crisis Pakistan gave a befitting response to India’s aerial infringement and Mr Modi had to lament the absence of Rafale aircraft that might have saved India some embarrassment. He seems to have forgotten before triggering the current crisis that the Rafales have yet to arrive and if the IAF or his ground forces suffer reverses he would have no option but to escalate both horizontally and vertically to save face. The consequences of such an escalation for not only South Asia but the world in general are all too well known to be repeated here. Some Indian analysts have been declaring nonchalantly that in the event of a nuclear war between India and Pakistan the latter will cease to exist as a viable entity while the former would still survive what they tend to forget is what Herman Kahn once said that, after a nuclear exchange the living will envy the dead. One can only hope that the Indian courts uphold the laws and norms of justice and strike down the travesty of India’s own constitution. Otherwise the current BJP dispensation in India is bent upon climbing up the escalation ladder pulling Pakistan in its wake and putting the lives of one and a half billion people of South Asia in jeopardy.
Scholars believe future conflict between Pakistan and India could revolve around water disputes. The situation…
In a sudden turn of events, the standoff between India and China in eastern Ladakh…
Pakistan is tightly gripped by climate change, despite contributing less than 1% to the greenhouse…
In an anarchic world where governments persistently pursue their own interests, the spectre of conflict…
In International Security, a nation’s strategic considerations evolve in response to changing geopolitical dynamics and…
During the presidency of Joe Biden, climate change had been one of the areas in…