Indeed, economic policy is not a sovereign role, but its formulation is becoming increasingly geopolitical: it occurs in a globe that is more interconnected than ever before. Undoubtedly, the most significant change in global economic strategy was former US President Donald Trump’s trade war, particularly with China. Tariffs were once used as weapons of targeted economic defense, but under Trump, they have become a tool for nationalistic economic dominance. Is there going to be a global recession soon? We get a sobering look at how these programs failed to deliver on their promises and nearly plunged the world into a recession.
Fundamentally, though, Trump’s rationale was based on corruption: he claimed that by imposing high tariffs on Chinese goods, he was able to reduce the trade deficit, preserve American jobs, and restore home manufacturing. The idea was that there would be a multiplier effect, which would be funded by customers and companies who give “buy American” preference. However, the simple equation does not capture the complexity of the global economic ecology. International relationships were strained, global markets were upset, and American consumers suffered as a result of this boomerang.
The biggest and first consequence of these tariffs was a rise in prices for US consumers. Tariffs are forms of taxes on imports. Trump levied duties on Chinese steel, electronics, and consumer goods, and the costs did not disappear; they were added to the rest of the supply chain. Raw materials costed more for American businesses, and everyday goods cost more for American households. The Tax Foundation said the tariff war made an additional $1,300 per year for the average US household. It was all meant to safeguard the average worker, but paradoxically, it ended up making their wallet more stretched.
But China’s counterattack was prompt and precise. Trump’s rural base was the target of Beijing’s retaliatory tariffs on US agricultural exports. For instance, there was less demand for soybean producers. The solution was billions of dollars in subsidies to appease farmers, which is ironic given that the Trump administration promoted market capitalism and less government involvement.
This trade war is having a ripple impact on global supply chains. Modern manufacturing does not go from one country to another. Most items’ components are obtained from a dozen or more countries. Tariffs can disrupt this system, causing delays, inefficiencies, and higher production costs. If businesses could not afford it, they rearranged their priorities or pushed the customers. However, in order to remain profitable, some companies were compelled to lay off employees. Tariffs threatened employment rather than protecting it.
This, however, went beyond the economic. Politically, the trade war represented a move toward isolationism and unilateralism. The move alienated US allies, already uncomfortable with the Trump administration’s withdrawal from important international agreements. The steel and aluminum tariffs blindsided long-standing US allies such as Europe, Canada, and Japan. The Trump administration preferred to rather point the gun at their own friends instead of rallying their allies to work together in addressing trade-related concerns with China. By doing so, it corroded the global consensus that it is important for the international community to seek fair solutions on issues such as intellectual property rights and market access with China.
Uncertainty was increased by tariffs. Companies detest uncertainty. The world economy collapsed as businesses, including some banks, delayed hiring and investment decisions, which fueled concerns of a further market decline. The World Trade Organization reduced its projection for trade growth. To calm markets, the European Central Bank, the US Federal Reserve, and other central banks devised emergency measures.
If this ‘economic nationalism and counter – tariff’ pattern continues, the recession could come back on the horizon. The economic slowdown is not confined to US-China trade. But there are such shock waves through global financial systems, emerging markets, and commodity prices. The tremor that the whole world feels when the two largest economies in the world clash.
It is not possible for any single powerful country to set the rules of the global trade. Exactly to prevent confrontations such as the ones now being staged, there are institutions such as the World Trade Organization, regional blocs, and cooperative frameworks. Trump’s tariff war sidelined the U.S. and global economy’s own mechanisms, and yet his actions weakened the very architecture of global commerce.
As the 2020s Unfold. By safeguarding everything, some countries get short-term votes while harming the economy in the long run. Tariffs are a brutal instrument that might harm a fragile global economy. They interrupt rather than build. They separate rather than unite.
If meaningful efforts are made to safeguard workers, policies should not follow Mr. Trump’s dance but rather focus on education, innovation, and trade agreements that include workers and the environment. A global coordinated struggle against unfair trade by China should be more than just populist bluster and a one-man show.
Economic nationalism can no longer even pass as a strength in a globalized world. Strength is in real cooperation, strategy, and vision. Tariffs, if misused, turn that strength into self-inflicted weakness.
Be the first to comment